Comparison of Native & Hybrid App Development Frameworks

8th August , 2018

Hybrid app frameworks is quiet a reliable one as it has been put across to bridge the gap between the enactment of a native app and the comfort of development of an application. Hybrid apps have evolved with the use of web technologies such as: HTML5, CSS and JavaScript.

A Native application is an advanced platform for use on selected platform or devices. Because Native apps are written for a selected platform, they could engage with and take gain of working device functions and other software programs.

As each technology supports Hybrid (HTML5, CSS and JavaScript) and Native can create apps which are good to go for Android, iPhone in App Stores. Counting potential of these, going thru the pros and cons of using Hybrid app development vs Native app development technology is the topic of the day.

1. Design of Interfaces: Almost all Mobile interfaces can be developed with either Native app or Hybrid app development technologies, but there’s more flexibility in designing those interfaces with the use of Hybrid app technology. Hybrid makes use of HTML5 and CSS3 that have far superior talents whilst designing interfaces with many shape factors and extraordinarily dynamic content material. However, occasionally it turns tedious and time ingesting to put in efforts for designs and complex interfaces for the hybrid app development technology. The Native app improvement environment affords tools and design widgets for growing standard interfaces with native consumer interaction experience which aren’t currently available using hybrid app development gear. So, it is less complicated to create native app consumer enjoy using local app improvement environment.

2. Cost: It is more price effective to build mobile apps using Hybrid app improvement technology stack. Hybrid apps leverage high quality and various sets of libraries as well as offering the necessary tools required to lessen the effort time. However, if you want to create a particular native user experience and native sense out of it, it will obviously be extra time taking and high-priced to layout and develop that particular native user experience with the help of hybrid app technology. Also, with hybrid app development, you may build it once and put up it across all the platforms (iPhone, Android, Windows Phone). So, you would be saving cash by means of no longer having to construct the app the usage of the native programming language of each platform.

3. Development Timeline: One cannot ignore that Hybrid apps are way easier and faster to develop and also deploy. However, if there are plenty of native and complicated add-ons which can be sometimes beyond the functionality of the hybrid app framework and environment, then it will be extra time ingesting to construct for hybrid apps.

4. User Experience and Performance: Native apps offer better overall performance, responsive and fluid exp in and a consumer can navigate and interact with the app without noticing any loading delays. Additionally, the local app improvement environment gives layout and person interplay widgets that come as a standard with each platform. Hybrid apps generally tend to have some interaction delays, and users can be aware that the app isn’t always as responsive every so often.

5. Maintainability: Hybrid apps are greater maintainable as long as the developer chooses a proper framework consisting of KendoUI, jQuery cellular, Ionic, and so forth. This is due to the fact it’s miles simpler to keep the Web app era (HTML, CSS and JavaScript) than the Native app generation. Also, it is crucial to notice that if the right framework isn’t used for hybrid app and the code isn’t written nicely, the app will no longer be maintainable.

6. Limitations: Native apps have evolved the usage of Native app Design Tools that are supplied for the motive of building the mobile apps platforms, so imposing many Native features and new technologies are without problems adaptable and built into the native cellular app Environment Tools that are provided for each platform. When building hybrid apps, the developer relies on the mobile app development framework and equipment and its capabilities and supplied features to build the app. So, if the tools and framework used isn’t updated to provide certain new features, the developer can struggle to put into effect capabilities that are not supplied with the aid of the hybrid app improvement Framework and Tools.

7. Security: Depending on the security, Native apps may additionally offer better security environment; but, most of the security troubles are created primarily due to the lack of expertise on the developer’s end and also on the safety and server-facet safety problems. So, if the app calls for many protection functions, you can want to ensure that all the security functions are applied in Hybrid app environment.

8. Support and Resources: Since application development Environment provides a good deal of tools and options to develop for programs, there are support and available tools for building mobile programs.

9. Tools and Debugging: Native advancement supplies improved Development environments and tooling to test and debug the work, so it’s far easier and less time intensive to locate and fix bugs utilizing native development Tools. There aren’t reliable hybrid application development tools which can aid with debugging and fixing issues, so, sometimes the programmer may devote a couple of hours to fix an issue in hybrid application environment where the same problem might be identified and locked in minutes utilizing the native application development tools.

10. Platform Independent: Among the main benefit of hybrid application development is the programmer can build it once and after that utilizing a technology like Adobe PhoneGap, submit the application to all platforms.

11. Popularity: Since application, Environment supply a fluid user experience and not as inclined to possess feature limitations, the majority of the massive application companies utilize native application development environment as opposed to hybrid app environment.

Here are scenarios for building programs in native or hybrid:

Hybrid: For budgetary limitation, a hybrid application can be a better choice. When there’s a need to rapidly develop the app might be a better option. In case the application is straightforward, doesn’t have animations, doesn’t have a lot of clicks and doesn’t require a lot of User interaction, the hybrid will be a better option.


In case the need is to make the best user experience, native development is a much better choice. For companies with an allocated budget which are planning to construct and maintain app jobs and don’t want to worry about limitations for implementing new technology and support, native is a better choice.

In the world of mobile application development, we are always searching for shorter development cycles, faster time to setup, and better app performance. A business of delivering programs in need fast must discover a cross platform mobile application development tool. A tool having necessary templates which would take the travails from the attempts essential to lay the foundation for the application. The base is already there as firms intrigued in cross platform application development can utilize open source frameworks.

All Comments

"Great content", thanks for sharing.

coque iphone 10

28th October , 2019 09:43:17 AM

"Great content", thanks for sharing.

Smart Touch Technologies

21st July , 2019 09:16:42 PM

"Great content", thanks for sharing.


1st May , 2019 10:03:42 AM

"Great content", thanks for sharing.


17th April , 2019 04:59:54 AM

"Great content", thanks for sharing.


23rd January , 2019 02:04:23 AM

"Great content", thanks for sharing.


3rd September , 2018 05:13:26 PM

"Great content", thanks for sharing.


3rd September , 2018 05:13:01 PM

See all comments